Not content to lie about the present and the future, Republicans have stepped up efforts to rewrite history. In Texas, the right-wing elected officials charged with setting the state’s curriculum voted to ensure that Texas schoolchildren will learn, among other things, that the founders were Christian, there is no separation of church and state, Thomas Jefferson wasn’t very important, Joseph McCarthy was right, Republicans passed the Civil Rights bill, and black people are violent.
Of course, ignorance of the beliefs of the founders is nothing new in Texas, at least if former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey is any indication. When asked why he was basing opposition to the “government takeover” of health care on the Federalist Papers when their principal author, Alexander Hamilton, “was widely regarded then and now as an advocate of a strong central government,” Armey replied: “Widely regarded by whom? Today’s modern ill-informed political science professors? . . . I just doubt that was the case in fact about Hamilton.”
Armey’s comment that “I just doubt that was the case” is telling, and makes the Texas effort even more disturbing. The Republican take on the founders isn’t based on an alternate reading of history. It’s not based on any reading at all, but rather an unwavering faith that our history conforms with their current political aims.
Right-wing nutcase extraordinaire Rep. Steve King of Iowa (even more here!) combined the efforts to lie about the past and present, both exaggerating the implications of the health care bill and downplaying the oppression under Communist regimes by calling for a “Velvet Revolution” to respond to the Democrats’ health care efforts. This is not the first time that Republicans, apparently unaware that one of the features of democracy is that sometimes your side loses, have compared themselves to victims of totalitarianism.
But perhaps the most disturbing Republican take on history last week came from Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia, who said that if health care reform passes, people’s “free insurance cards” (whatever the hell that means) will be as worthless as Confederate currency after “the Great War of Yankee Aggression.” Really?!? Still?
But I suppose that, even in the context of an intense, often race-based hysteria caused by the election of our first black president, I shouldn’t be too concerned about an elected official trying to undermine the legitimacy of the Civil War. I mean, it’s not like Republican leaders are running ads imploring good God-fearing Americans to take the country back from scary black men.
-AR























The sentiments included in this link are thought to be deep insight into today’s America.
http://earthhopenetwork.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=3281 My coworkers were amazed to realize that the Nazi’s did not take over Austria with guns, but with Obama-like sneakiness! Guess that’s what happens when you drool on your desk during your school days, then segue into Fox News for the rest of your life. Those poor Austrians, I wonder who hoodwinked them into performing about 40% of the Holocaust exterminations?
To Jimbo: I find it strange how frequently Nazi’s are now referenced, without any real relevancy, in American Politics. A Google Image search of either George W. Bush and the word Nazi, or Obama and the word Nazi will produce page after page of caustic photoshopped images, while searching for the same for Bill Clinton, or Ronald Regan will find nothing at all. I can’t help but think this is more than just an increased access to photo-editing.